Newsflash

By Haaretz Service

Outgoing Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said in remarks published Monday that Israel would have to withdraw from East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights if it was serious about making peace with the Palestinians and Syria.

In an interview with the Yedioth Aharonoth daily, Olmert said that as a hard-line politician for decades he had not been prepared to look at reality in all of its depth.

"Ariel Sharon spoke about painful costs and refused to elaborate," Olmert told the daily. "I say, we have no choice but to elaborate. In the end of the day, we will have to withdraw from the most decisive areas of the territories. In exchange for the same territories left in our hands, we will have to give compensation in the form of territories within the State of Israel."

"I think we are very close to an agreement," Olmert added.

These comments were the clearest sign to date of Olmert's willingness to meet key Palestinian demands in peace talks.

With regard to the Syria track, Olmert added that a future peace agreement required a pullout from the Golan Heights, an area under Israeli control since the 1967 Six-Day War.

"First and foremost, we must make a decision. I'd like to see if there is one serious person in the State of Israel who believes it is possible to make peace with the Syrians without eventually giving up the Golan Heights."

"It is true that an agreement with Syria comes with danger," he said. "Those who want to act with zero danger should move to Switzerland."

Yedioth Aharonoth noted that in this "legacy interview," published on the eve of the Jewish New Year, Olmert went further in making offers for peace than he ever did publicly when he was in active office and had greater power to see them carried out.

The interview was met with fierce criticism from politicians on both the right and the left.

MK Yuval Steinitz said the comments demonstrated the outgoing leader's readiness "to ignore even the most crucial" of Israel's needs.

"The prime minister's concession the essential borders of defense is a gamble on the bone of existence, and the future of the State of Israel," Steinitz told Army Radio in response to Olmert's comments.

"Ignoring the distance between rockets fired from afar and the enemy sitting on top of Jerusalem reveals how little he understands the basis of security," Steinitz added.

Former Meretz chairman Yossi Beilin criticized Olmert for having offered such concessions only on the eve of his departure from premiership.

"Olmert has committed the unforgivable sin of revealing his truce stance on Israel's national interest just when he has nothing left to lose," said Beilin.

According to Western and Palestinian officials, Olmert has proposed in peace talks with the Palestinians an Israeli withdrawal from some 93 percent of the West Bank, plus all of the Gaza Strip, from which Israel pulled out in 2005.

The negotiations, which Olmert has vowed to continue until he leaves office when a new government is formed, have shown few signs of progress and both sides acknowledge chances are slim of meeting Washington's target of a deal by the end of the year.

Olmert has also engaged Syria in indirect negotiations with Turkish mediation, but has not remarked publicly on the scope of an Israeli pullout from the Golan Heights.

Olmert has said repeatedly that Israel intends to keep major Jewish settlement blocs in the West Bank in any future peace deal with the Palestinians.

A peace agreement, Olmert has said, would mean Israel would have to compensate the Palestinians for the land it hopes to retain by "close to a 1-to-1 ratio."

In exchange for the settlement enclaves, Olmert has proposed about a 5 percent land swap giving the Palestinians a desert territory adjacent to the Gaza Strip, as well as land on which to build a transit corridor between Gaza and the West Bank.

He has so far put off negotiations on sharing Jerusalem and ruled out a so-called "right of return" for Palestinian refugees, a central Palestinian demand. On both issues, there is strong opposition in Israel to significant concessions.

Olmert, who has stepped down in the face of a possible criminal indictment in a corruption investigation, will remain caretaker prime minister until a new government is approved by parliament.

A week ago, President Shimon Peres asked Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni, now leader of Olmert's centrist Kadima party, to try to put together a governing coalition within six weeks. Failure to do so would likely lead to a parliamentary election.

 

 

Home arrow Palestine arrow Apartheid in South Africa, Apartheid in Israel
Apartheid in South Africa, Apartheid in Israel PDF Print E-mail
Tuesday, 13 May 2008
Fighting apartheid in South Africa, celebrating apartheid in Israel

Open letter to Nadine Gordimer*

28 April 2008

In your response to our letters of concern and protest over your planned visit to Israel, to participate in a writers festival largely endorsed by the Israeli government, you brush off our criticism, citing the role of literature in "opening up the human mind" and claiming that "whatever violent, terrible, bitter and urgent chasms of conflict lie between peoples, the only solution for peace and justice exist and must begin with both sides talking to one another."  So talking, in your opinion, has replaced resistance as the starting point for ending injustice and fighting apartheid and colonial rule?  Is that what you and your fellow anti-apartheid colleagues did in your struggle in South Africa – talk to the "other side"?

It is also worth reminding you that Palestinian writers in the occupied Palestinian territory (OPT), like all Palestinians under Israeli occupation, are denied their basic rights, including the "privilege" of freedom of expression which you -- and all of us -- so highly value.  They are often denied their right to travel, sometimes even within the OPT; many are denied access to conferences and festivals where they can participate in a free exchange of ideas with their peers on an international level; and some are imprisoned, injured or killed by the occupation forces. By attending this conference you are helping to perpetuate this special form of apartheid that denies us our human rights.

You start your letter asserting that you are "not invited to Israel by the Israeli Government."  Is this accurate?  Even if it is, is it relevant?  You are invited, technically, by that Writers Festival; but the festival itself is primarily funded, promoted, and sponsored by Israeli government sources.  Hair-splitting aside, you are, indeed, invited by the Israeli government.  Even if that festival were not at all supported by the government, does it in any way take a stand against the occupation, racism and apartheid that essentially define the reality of Israel today for you to consider it acceptable to participate in? 

Let us not forget, either, that those Israeli writers who invited you are themselves not exactly opposed to their state's key forms of racist and colonial oppression against the indigenous people of Palestine.  They are virtually all Zionists who fully endorse and sometimes openly advocate, to varying degrees, the main pillars of the system of racial discrimination against Palestinian citizens within Israel, the denial of the Palestinian refugees' right to return, in accordance with international law, and even some aspects of the military occupation and colonization of the West Bank, especially in East Jerusalem.  Imagine what your reaction would have been if a liberal international writer, of your stature, had accepted an invitation by some group of Afrikaner writers -- most of whom not opposing apartheid itself, but only supporting of a subset of rights for blacks under apartheid -- to a festival in apartheid South Africa that took no public position against the system of racial discrimination there. 

Do you need to be reminded of how you, and the late Palestinian intellectual Edward Said, lobbied Susan Sontag to reject the Jerusalem Prize?  As far as we know, your logic was that the involvement of the state, represented by Shimon Peres as a judge of the "literary" prize at the time, meant that Sontag and other writers should not participate.

In addition, we are utterly disappointed and saddened by your insulting attempt to "balance" your act of complicity by promising to visit a Palestinian university or some venue in Ramallah!  Was visiting a Bantustan ever a moral or rational excuse for participating in a largely pro-apartheid gathering in South Africa?  Your participation simply violates the Palestinian Call for Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel [1], issued in 2004 and widely respected by progressive writers, academics and cultural figures around the world.

And what about the timing?  You know well that this festival, like all other cultural events scheduled to take place in Israel during this period, is planned to, and most likely will, promote the "Israel at 60" celebrations.  Regardless of your intentions, taking part in such an occasion that ignores the fundamental truth that Israel came into existence 60 years ago as a result of a systematic and brutal campaign of ethnic cleansing, what Palestinian refer to as the Nakba, that led to the dispossession and expulsion of more than 750,000 Palestinians is itself an act of collusion in whitewashing Israel's seminal crime.  Doing so at this particular time, when Israel is committing war crimes and "acts of genocide," as international law expert Richard Falk describes them, in occupied Gaza is indicative of a regrettable cross over to the side of the oppressor and a betrayal of your principles in defence of the oppressed.

* By Omar Barghouti and Haidar Eid, both members of the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (www.PACBI.org).

[1] The PACBI Call for Boycott is endorsed by tens of the leading academic, cultural, professional and other Palestinian civil society unions and organizations: http://www.pacbi.org/campaign_statement.htm

Last Updated ( Tuesday, 05 August 2008 )
 
< Prev   Next >

News Feed


Press TV
PRESS TV RSS News
British interpreter accused of espionage
An interpreter who worked for Britain's top commander in Afghanistan has been accused of spying after being passed over for promotion.
51 killed in Pakistan's tribal regions
At least 51 people are killed in clashes between Pakistani forces and Taliban militants as fighting spreads across the northwest tribal regions.
Mottaki: West failed to root out terrorism
Iran's Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki says the West's failure to combat extremism has forced them to negotiate with fanatics.
Turkey: No buffer zone inside Iraq
Turkish PM Recep Tayyip Erdogan rejects calls by the opposition to set up a buffer zone inside Iraq to stop attacks by Kurdish militants.
Ankara 'in secret PKK talks with Kurds'
Ankara has been in secret talks with the Iraqi Kurds to fight Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) militants holed up in northern Iraq.
BBC News Feed
BBC News | Middle East | World Edition
Peres peace call in riot-hit town
Israel President Shimon Peres calls for restraint among leaders four days of Jewish-Arabs rioting in the town of Acre.
Iran 'bribing Iraqi politicians'
Iran is trying to bribe Iraqi legislators into rejecting a security deal with the US, says the American commander in Iraq.
Livni 'makes key coalition deal'
Israel's Kadima and Labour parties have reached a deal that brings Tzipi Livni closer to becoming PM, her spokesman says.
Lebanon arrests 'Tripoli cell'
Lebanese police say a group of alleged extremists arrested on Sunday were involved in deadly attacks on the army.
'No more need' for British troops
The Iraqi prime minister has said British troops are no longer needed to maintain security in Iraq.

Who's Online

© 2008 Media Review | Website Designed and Optimised by Go Fish Client Catchers